I seem to remember one of my colleagues getting the chance to interview Bowie for the first time off the back of that debut Tin Machine album. Finally a chance to meet the hero of his youth! And then, he told us bitterly, he was ushered into the record company conference room and found Bowie flanked by the other three members of Tin Machine. How his heart sank! He'd dreamed of a tête-à-tête with the most fascinating man in all of rock. Instead, there was he was, sat on one side of the conference table, Bowie deferentially letting his colleagues speak, Reeves Gabrels expatiating about guitar sounds...
On the cover, not only is it not just Bowie's face on the front - as it was with all his previous album covers - but he is the smallest and furthest back figure. The suits and ties don't look very alt-rock admittedly. But the Julien Temple megamix promo film above does show "audience members" jumping onstage and diving off again at one point, which does seem like an attempt to reposition DB with the young thing. Also struck by the fact that Tin Machine played Town and Country Club - i.e. the sort of venue the likes of Pixies and Loop would play - and much smaller than the kind of venue Bowie could command normally.
I suppose the parallel work at that time to Tin Machine / Tin Machine II - elders trying to get with the young thing - would be Achtung Baby. After the debacle (not commercially but in terms of credibility as well as quality) that was Rattle and Hum, U2 had a major rethink and an aesthetic refueling / reorientation. And apparently what they listened to was things like The Young Gods and My Bloody Valentine - i.e. the Maker canon.
In fact, here is an Eno quote about the self-induced transvaluation U2 underwent:
"Buzzwords on this record were trashy, throwaway, dark, sexy, and industrial (all good) and earnest, polite, sweet, righteous, rockist and linear (all bad). It was good if a song took you on a journey or made you think your hifi was broken, bad if it reminded you of recording studios or U2. Sly Stone, T. Rex, Scott Walker, My Bloody Valentine, KMFDM, the Young Gods, Alan Vega, Al Green, and Insekt were all in favour. And Berlin ... became a conceptual backdrop for the record. The Berlin of the Thirties—decadent, sexual and dark—resonating against the Berlin of the Nineties—reborn, chaotic and optimistic ..."
Now, who the fuck were Insekt? I have always wondered that and have never thought to find out!
Also "rockist" as a no-no? You can't get more rockist - in the sense of exulting-in-guitar, than MBV or The Young Gods (albeit in their case done through sampling punk and metal riffs)... Alan Vega is pure rock'n'roll: Elvis filtered thru Iggy.. T. Rex is the eternal spirit-sprite of rock'n'roll.,,
But I get what Eno means - U2 were rejecting a certain kind of rockism prevalent in the compact-disc Eighties: that godawful Robbie Robertson album (that now I think about it he made with Daniel Lanois), the comeback of John Fogerty, Dire Straits's Brothers In Arms... with Achtung, they were jettisoning all that rootsy, bluesy, Memphis-invoking bollocks that infused Rattle.
But U2 being rockers (and rockist) at core far more than Bowie ever was, on Achtung they managed to pull it off handsomely.
I wonder if it was galling for DB to see U2 scoring hits and plaudits having done such a similar move to what he'd attempted on the two Tin Machines...


I love Achtung Baby: it’s probably my favourite U2 album. But it is hilarious that they were trying to stop being earnest and righteous, and the result was songs like One, Acrobat, and Love Is Blindness.
ReplyDeleteIt reminds me of one of my favourite movie lines, from Muriel’s Wedding. Muriel, played by the great Toni Collette, discovers that the women she thought were her friends actually can’t stand her, and have been getting together to have fun without her. Muriel begs to be allowed into their group, saying she can stop doing all the things that they hate. “I can change,” she pleads. One of her fake friends replies: “Yes, but you’ll still be you.”
That’s also part of what happened with Tin Machine, I am sure. Bowie is still Bowie, and his skills, interests and character are much less well-aligned with the Daydream Nation than they were with the Futurists or the New Pop crowd. Look at the suits on the album cover, for a start… Just wildly out of place in 1989.
But the other big problem is that his skills as a talent-spotter - supernaturally good up until the early 80s - had deserted him. Reeves Gabrels, the lead guitar in Tin Machine and a major contributor to its failure, was the husband of Bowie’s tour publicist. Which is no rational basis for hiring a guitar-player. It could have been serendipity, but as it turned out, it wasn’t.
If Bowie had hired J Mascis, or Kevin Shields, Tin Machine might have been more interesting, at least.
Another example of Bowie not really understanding the essence of that genre of rock: his notorious mix of Iggy’s Raw Power, which someone (Carducci?) described as sounding like he had dropped it in the Atlantic on his way over.
DeleteAlthough to be fair, Pop’s own attempt at a mix in the 2010s, with everything overloaded and all the needles in the red, sounds pretty ugly in a 21st century digital technology kind of way. I definitely prefer the Bowie mix.
Yeah the Iggymix is unbearable... it's also cringey the way he tries in the sleevenote to be polite to his benefactor Bowie while also venting his sense of grievance about the mix. Difficulty balancing act, not fully pulled off!
DeleteI remember on first hearing Raw Power thinking it sounded weak compared to Fun House... but it's much better than the Iggymix.
Yes it's a great mystery, where the Immense Talent suddenly loses touch with their own gift - including as you say the not inconsiderable gift of hiring other talents.
DeleteHow can you go from writing "Ashes To Ashes" to putting out record like "Blue Jean"? You have the same ears, the same inside knowledge of genius budding forth from within... surely your senses tell you this isn't up to snuff
So many other examples... Morrissey working with his 90s musicians having worked with Marr and with Viny Reilly.... really, you can't hear the difference? That the melodies aren't anywhere in the same vicinity?
Or Marr himself - having written "Suffer Little Children" and "The Headmaster's Ritual" and "How Soon Is Now", and then doing "Girlfriend In A Coma"....
Love Toni Colette, especially in that movie...
Interesting to note that the "Legacy Edition" of Raw Power puts the Bowie mix first, as if in a tacit concession that it is actually the one you will want to hear.
DeleteThere should be a term for the tendency for certain artists (basically, artists already established as "great") to have their subsequent works judged on a binary scale, as either excellent or abysmal, even if the work in question is average. An obvious example is Oasis; their reunion concert only had to be good to be deemed great, and it only had to be a bit unremarkable to be deemed utterly piss-poor. I suspect Tin Machine may well suffer from this ruthless categorisation, and the fairer judgement of "not really among Bowie's best work" automatically becomes "dogshit on toast".
ReplyDeleteI think the Tin Machine stuff is actively bad by any standards, not just measured against his own skyscraping best....
DeleteAlso, you could say, that - rather than him being judged against his own work and falling short - actually it's only cos of his legend and previous extraordinary achievements that anyone would bother to pay attention. Could Tin Machine, as a new band of unknowns, even have got signed?
That's a very tasteful list of names that Eno gives for a band who were attempting to sound " thrashy " or
ReplyDelete" throwaway ", but then that's the truth about Achtung Baby - It wasn't so much a shift from an Americana to a Europhile sensibility so much as a shift from one approved (and approvable ) canon to another.
It did yield some fine work, mind. I would offer by way of a controversial opinion that the opening track on AB - Zoo Station succeeds in doing in four-and-a-half minutes, much more effectively, what Bowie was attempting in the ten-minute title track on Station To Station - declaring, here it is, a new career in a new town.
One crucial difference between Achtung Baby and Tin Machine - U2 were still young enough for their enthusiasm towards My Bloody Valentine and the like to seem genuine, whereas, Bowie, already in his early forties when he formed Tin Machine, wanting to be seen to dig the new breed, came across like a mildly hipper equivalent of Elton John performing duets with George Michael or LeAnn Rimes.
In music as in life, you have to know when the youngsters want you out of the room.
I have to agree with Ed about “Achtung Baby”. Scratch the surface and it’s still very much U2. To take only one aspect of continuity with the old U2, their rock-solid Christian faith frequently gives the lie to their “dark, existential” meanderings; Bono put on a Judas mask only to affirm his faith in Jesus. The more daring experiments (for them) are on the follow-up, “Zooropa”, which is also U2-ey in most respects but takes a few more chances and flirts *almost* convincingly with real despair. The record wasn’t nearly as popular and, predictably, U2 INC. took over again and slammed the door on that stuff, keeping only the “ironic” pomo schtick. Anyway, I laughed then and laugh now at Bono saying they were “chopping down the Joshua Tree”. They did no such thing—thank goodness.
ReplyDeleteI think they backlashed against themselves too much and lost sight of the fact that their sincerity was the reason why a lot of people liked them. I thought Zooropa was great, but more for the change in musical options rather than the supposed embrace of postmodernism (a pose that never held up - the best moments of the Zoo TV shows were when they shut the spectacle down and moved to a smaller stage just to play together as a band).
DeleteThe washed-out tuneless Pop LP was where they really encountered the limits of trying to be Anti-U2 - The point of realisation might have been the track The Playboy Mansion where Bono tries to suggest that he's the Jeff Koons of rock singing about Coke, Big Macs, Playboy, etc and you can tell he doesn't believe a word of it.
At the risk of being even meaner than Jon Wilde’s review, I think another reason for Tin Machine’s failure must surely have been the fact that the non-Bowie band members look like such a bunch of tossers.
ReplyDeleteI mean, I’m sure they’re all perfectly nice people etc, but, y’know - frowning bloke with receding hairline, bloke with ostentatious long hair, bloke who looks like a tennis player - just a woefully uncool looking bunch, irrespective of their musical talents, all looking so awkwardly posed and uncomfortable in those photos.
Kind of reminds me of Garbage (the band) at the other end of the ‘90s - unsightly “studio pros” desperately trying to look vaguely like rock stars, hiding behind a charismatic front person.
And, if they really were trying to style themselves as an alt-rock / faux-underground type proposition… well, there is no way any of those bands would have gone ANYWHERE NEAR the kind of besuited, “quirkily staring in different directions against a white backdrop” album cover seen here; just marks them out as terminally naff before we’ve even heard a note.
I mean, never mind his musical instincts, Bowie’s visual / aesthetic instincts were clearly in a right mess at this point…
The Tin Machine visual aesthetic was basically Robert Palmer.
DeleteIt's a bold move Cotton etc.
So Simon, was it unfair and spiteful of MM then to not even put Achtung.Baby in their Top 30 albums of 1991!
ReplyDeleteThose end of year Top 30 lps and top 20 singles are polls of the critics, so I guess not enough of them liked it enough to vote for it.
DeleteMaybe some were keeping the head down about them liking it. In the closet so to speak.
ReplyDeleteApparently, Bowie's then publicist had the unenviable task of reading out Jonh Wilde's review over the phone to the artist, then in Switzerland.... and Bowie was in tears. I wonder if this stemmed from sentimental feeling about the paper: after all, Melody Maker had been the place he'd lit the blue touch paper of his career with "I am gay and I always have been".... Or perhaps it was because Tin Machine modelled on precisely the kind of bands - Pixies, Sonic Youth, et al - MM was pushing then and that he wanted credibility in that arena.
ReplyDelete