I was wondering when you would get to this in your McCullough retrospective. It is notorious, of course. As I remember it, Tony Wilson and the surviving band members were furious. And there is no denying that the last two paragraphs - in particular, the first sentence of the penultimate paragraph - are catastrophically ill-judged. But I think overall it is better than its reputation suggests. He's writing with raw feelings that are genuinely powerful, and incline me to forgive the points where he gets carried away and goes too far. And he situates Curtis in a place and time better than any other writer before or since. A work of flawed genius.
nuddy horror attack (noo wave edition)
-
Pin-up of the thickly thatched Jimmy Pursey, at a female reader's request,
duly answered by the equal-opportunity musical newspaper*...
before deejays were cool (slight return)
-
why is this 1971 advertisement from the era before deejays were cool?
it's not the fashion - the sideburns, the superwide tie.
tha...
anti-theatricality and politics: the Showdown
-
That Trump is something like the apotheosis of the dysfunction of the
American system does not mean that he is the end of the story. He may well
be the b...
-
"[Baudrillard's] vision of contemporary society exhibits a careening of
growth and excrescence (croissance et excroissance), expanding and
excreting eve...
The Old Musical Express
-
*New Musical Express *on the 1983 reissue of *Charlie Gillett*'s 1971 book *The
Sound of the City. *
Reviewer *Paul Du Noyer* notes that "*in...
faves of the 2010s
-
(Tracks not full lengths)
Ke$ha – “We R Who We R”
Ke$ha - “Backstabber”
Ariel Pink's Haunted Graffiti, "Round and Round"
Rangers – “Golden Triangles”...
angel delights
-
https://rada-ve.bandcamp.com/track/saturn-rings-songs
*Go on* - listen to that gorgeous bubble bath of synthtronica!
Another vintage release, with a vi...
I was wondering when you would get to this in your McCullough retrospective. It is notorious, of course. As I remember it, Tony Wilson and the surviving band members were furious. And there is no denying that the last two paragraphs - in particular, the first sentence of the penultimate paragraph - are catastrophically ill-judged. But I think overall it is better than its reputation suggests. He's writing with raw feelings that are genuinely powerful, and incline me to forgive the points where he gets carried away and goes too far. And he situates Curtis in a place and time better than any other writer before or since. A work of flawed genius.
ReplyDeleteYes it's overwraught but absolutely forgivable in the circumstances I think - and authentic in its heroizing impulse.
ReplyDelete