I was wondering when you would get to this in your McCullough retrospective. It is notorious, of course. As I remember it, Tony Wilson and the surviving band members were furious. And there is no denying that the last two paragraphs - in particular, the first sentence of the penultimate paragraph - are catastrophically ill-judged. But I think overall it is better than its reputation suggests. He's writing with raw feelings that are genuinely powerful, and incline me to forgive the points where he gets carried away and goes too far. And he situates Curtis in a place and time better than any other writer before or since. A work of flawed genius.
None New Wavier (17 of ???)
-
Proficiency of the musicians - and the prowess / power of the singing -
suggests an Old Wave into New Wave makeover.
And indeed...
"Well you know my name is Simon"
-
Stephen Alexander, at his always interesting and insanely prolific
blog Torpedo the Ark, brightens my day, at this ever more darkening time,
with a post ab...
RIP Kenny Morris
-
One intriguing counterfactual in rock history is what would have happened
if drummer *Kenny Morris* and guitarist John McKay had not quit *Siouxsie
and t...
ardkive fever - the eternal returns
-
Brand-new anachronism from* Z-Neo*
Fault-less - very-nearly-convincing as time travel
The artwork by one AROE is very in the wildstyle of DJ Trax early ...
-
Q Among lesser known artists from less mainstream cultural traditions,
which ones would be good for our hearts to listen to?
I would hesitate to claim an...
The Future Is Behind Us
-
Specifically the future of cinema - *specifically* specifically 3D movies,
as reported in this Atlantic piece .
How funny that it should happen *again *...
angel delights
-
https://rada-ve.bandcamp.com/track/saturn-rings-songs
*Go on* - listen to that gorgeous bubble bath of synthtronica!
Another vintage release, with a vi...
I was wondering when you would get to this in your McCullough retrospective. It is notorious, of course. As I remember it, Tony Wilson and the surviving band members were furious. And there is no denying that the last two paragraphs - in particular, the first sentence of the penultimate paragraph - are catastrophically ill-judged. But I think overall it is better than its reputation suggests. He's writing with raw feelings that are genuinely powerful, and incline me to forgive the points where he gets carried away and goes too far. And he situates Curtis in a place and time better than any other writer before or since. A work of flawed genius.
ReplyDeleteYes it's overwraught but absolutely forgivable in the circumstances I think - and authentic in its heroizing impulse.
ReplyDelete