Showing posts with label JULIE BURCHILL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label JULIE BURCHILL. Show all posts

Monday, July 20, 2026

RIP Brian Case

My time at Melody Maker overlapped with the final year or so of Brian Case being on the staff. I don't think we exchanged more than a few words - he was pretty fed up by that point, barely in the office (the jazz section had been discontinued some years earlier, he was writing entirely about film for his last few years at MM). Soon he left to become the main writer about film - his other great passion aside from jazz - at Time Out.

I did not know then that prior to joining the Melody Maker he'd written for NME for several years, covering jazz with the occasional foray into rock etc.

A great critic - here's something I found just today where he caustically castigates a record I like (although in truth it's really "Jazz Is The Teacher (Funk Is The Preacher)", the inclusion on C81, that really lives with me - much of it I find nearly as battering and flailed as Case does, but not with the same kind of lifelong jazzbo antipathy, more a rocker's frustration).

I don't understand half the references but I enjoy the way his language moves.

 







Then in praise mode here's Case - and Richard Williams, the guy who lured him to MM -  paying tribute to Mingus.






Discernibly ambivalent about Ornette Coleman's journey into harmolodics (what sideman James 'Blood' Ulmer then pursued solo) 




























And a nicely nasty swipe at Julie Burchill - who'd he encountered in his later years at NME - and here is scolded for her lack of movie knowledge. 



And then this droll piece, which is possibly off-color by today's standards- comically mixing up Kingston, Jamaica and Kingston-Upon-Thames


Some more light relief

























And finally, here's Case praising, mostly, a record that I love - and that was the very first rock music  long-playing record I ever did buy, the week it came out. 


Ian Dury and the Blockheads

Do It Yourself

Melody Maker, May 19th 1979

by Brian Case

Uneasy lies the loaf that wears the titfer. Ian Dury's new album dispenses with the outsize characters of New Boots & Panties and moves bravely — since that cast of grotesques is clearly reproduceable, and bankable — into the autobiographically confessional. Of course, that needn't necessarily rate a round of applause — I would be desolate if Randy Newman broke cover — for, as Billy Wilder said of Marilyn Monroe, "there are certain wonderful rascals in this world, and one day they lie down on an analyst's couch and out comes a clenched, dreary thing."

The positive sensuality of 'Wake Up And Make Love With Me' has disappeared and so has the once-removed sexual violence of 'If I Was With A Woman'. Poles have been eroded, and what remains is infinitely true, infinitely troubled, and communicated through craft — and that is the name of the game. Dury distances pain through his love of words: he does not need the swaddlings of impersonation.

'Dance Of The Screamers', therefore, is a dance in the sense that Last Tango In Paris and Strindberg's Dance Of Death are a knees-up. Mother Black, and they draw their catheter of blood. 'Screamers' sets his on-stage kukka-burra brips and gibbon squeals in the context of total despair, algebra of need, visceral response, and is paralleled by what sounds like Davey Payne's overblown upper-register saxophone: a hip correlation. The lyrics are a blat of sexual rejection: "it's hard to be a hero when you've had your helmet cracked"; and the Black/Jewish wisdom in extremis of "some of us are witty, luv, it comes from facing up to facts." The number is too long, and the sarcastic "skies are blue" interjections are too obvious. It needed longer in the oven.

'Sink My Boats', on the other hand, is excellent. Germinating from the Woody Allen routine — "My wife was so immature she'd come into the bathroom without knocking and sink my boats" — the sketch that brought you "I didn't recognise my first wife with her wrists closed" and a lawsuit, Dury has constructed an internal monologue which precisely surfaces character. The closed circuit of "will you still love me when I'm over the hill is another stupid question" anatomises the endless bicker-and-rebuttal of a relationship on the skids, Where both parties bridle at the obverse of their ploys. Did I tell ya this is only rock 'n' roll? The tune is lovely, the arrangement harmonically complex, and the keyboard breaks — Mickey Gallagher? — inventive.

A more diffuse despair can be found on 'Mischief' and 'This Is What We Find'. Both utilise a catalogue of unfortunate happenings to fictitious characters, but move into sharper focus. 'Mischief' lists various naughtinesses — "Barry breaks the windows of his broken home — 'ave a guess — his tiny mind's been scarred" — and subverts these ineffectual rebellions still further with inconsequential documentation — "his dad's a shipping clerk." Behind the pathetic hell-raising lies the old cockney routine of local hero-worship — 'ee ONLY shaved a cart'orse's ankles and flogged it to The Filfth — tasty but inadequate — and the number ends in infantile apologies and pleas for mercy. It's very good indeed, and will get better on the road, as 'Quiet', 'Sink My Boats' and 'This Is What We Find' have refined against a sounding-board.

'This Is What We Find' — the outstanding piece here — is an Edward Gorey amusing mausoleum of catastrophe, and Dury takes transparent refuge in the sacerdotal pipes to reflect upon its burden — i.e.: the flesh is grass. A beautifully balanced piece, in which gabble prepares for thematic repetition, and one laughs at the indignities of the human condition: "A sense of humour is required amongst the bacon rind."

There's plenty of the familiar suburban self-improver in the vocabulary — and elsewhere, "blandishment" in 'Sink My Boats', "the wherewithal" in 'Dance' — as a mockery of the orotund in the face of such humiliation, and an Art School survival in the term "jubblified." There is a jolly pump and Wurlitzer bounce to the backing, and fun in the misfit of words to music.

'Don't Ask Me' and 'Inbetweenies' deal with the early stages of romance. "Here I stand with a doughnut for a brain," sings the suitor in 'Don't Ask Me', and goes on to list his virtues like a street-trader: "On my life, I believe we're tailor-made." The Blockheads complement the voice with nicely varied interjections, and there's a good guitar solo. All very Aldgate, and effective.

'Inbetweenies' is more complex. "A body likes to be near the bone" and "I die when I'm alone" indicate the desperation in this pitch, which settles for friendship with "at least you've put me on the team." There's a beautifully placed ambulance siren in the backing, and some good jazz piano.

'Quiet' contrasts three manners, the polite, the authoritarian and junior rudery. Based on an old schoolmaster of his, Dury's lyrics catch precisely the tone of posturing officialese — "quiet, persistent louts and clowns," "quiet, or else there will be measures" — and subverts it with a chorus of "plop-plops" and "big jobs." The guitar break, spitting like a cat in a bag, is very impressive.

'Uneasy Sunny Day Hotsy Totsy' and 'Waiting For Your Taxi' are slight, the latter mingling taped conversation and traffic noises like Mingus and Kirk, and launching an upper-register screamer from Davey Payne. Here is a deep, pneumatic whump to the vocal, a catchy chant like 'Rhythm Stick'.

Finally, 'Lullaby For Francis/Frances' — a sort of bookend to 'Wake Up' — opens with a fanfare before ducking into reggae. Dury's voice here is beautifully tender, deep, husky — for a change — cleanly recorded. I missed some of the words elsewhere in the mix. Melody and treatment are charming, and Charley Charles's beat — centipede with a wooden leg — is lithe and living. In the context of the album, a lullaby — "safe and sound, that's a promise" and "it's time to impose a curfew" — registers like the all-clear after a psychic air-raid.

Do It Yourself stands in the same relation to New Boots & Panties as Joseph Heller's second novel, Something Happened, does to Catch-22. Both artists kept us waiting, and finally delivered a less fevered dimension which nonetheless bears the authentic trademark.

Whether any of the new numbers will adapt as singalong material in live performance is conjectural. The important thing is that Ian Dury's creativity is still functioning at peak, and will move you from tears to laughter.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I think Case is wrong about "Dance of the Screamers", it's exactly as long as it should be, and one of Dury's greatest moments (Davey Payne's too). 




I also don't understand why he and the other reviewers in the weeklies all rated "Sink My Boats" so highly - is it really just because they recognised the Woody Allen reference? 


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

More Case on Dury









































Wednesday, January 3, 2024

Julie versus punk(s)

Julie Burchill had loudly left the NME for greener pastures by around 1981 - but she could be coaxed back for the occasional assassination. 

Here, in a single issue, May 28 1993 - and in fact, as printed, on a single page - she sticks the shiv into two punky old fools she must have rubbed shoulders with down the Roxy many a time: Malcolm McLaren and Siouxsie Sioux

Although for a long while a grieving punk epigone herself, insisting that nothing could ever compare to Sex Pistols, by around '83 JB had moved firmly into the acceptance stage of mourning and espoused the view that a properly adult usage of pop would be as an aural after-dinner mint, things like Sade that served as background sounds for grown-up conversation, or sex.  





























(via NME 1980s)





































Thursday, January 12, 2023

RIP Jane Suck / Jane Solanas























Sounds punk-era legend Jane Suck - who later wrote for NME as Jane Solanas, presumably an alias in homage to Valerie as in SCUM Manifesto - has died. 

Here is Suck's intro / manifesto co-written with Jon Savage for Sounds's landmark New Musick feature package that started November 26 1977 and continued  on December 3 1977.















And here is a piece she wrote as Solanas that is markedly different - a sympathetic take on Kate Bush at a time when the music press still largely scorned her as a kook with an overly dramatic / decorative and passe style of art-rock.  ( Indeed even in the dek / standfirst, written no doubt by some male editor, they can't resist getting some digs in: "Kate Bush has moulded herself in an icon of pop erotica — so much that suburban couples claim her breasts stimulate their love making. Yet to like her voice and music is the ultimate in being uncool. Jane Solanas decides to give Kate the benefit of the doubt." )

Scans first, followed by the text























KATE BUSH profile

NME October 15th, 1983

by Jane Solanas


"Dear Kate

I love you. My brother is in the army and he's a git. I couldn't tell anyone else that. And no one else seems bothered about soldiers getting blown up young. I know you care. I just don't know you…"


"Dear Kate

Me and my wife watched you on the tele and we found your breasts stimulate our love-making…"


"Dear Kate

Your being Roman Catholic interests me…"


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

There is the school of thought that Kate Bush is for mums and dads. Freakily lovable. The ET of pop — something to laugh at when females impersonate her on TV by donning explosions of brown wig, making stabbing actions with their hands, all the while wailing like a cat fight.

And there's a school who believe Kate Bush is "profoundly subversive", like Fred Vermorel.

Fred — more familiar to NME readers as Malcolm McLaren's old philosophical sparring partner, and co-author of a brilliant book, The Sex Pistols File — for some reason, freaked on Kate's nipples, which stuck out on the first EMI promotional poster, and went on to weave an almost demi-goddess identity for her, largely drawn from the rustic history of the Bush clan and Kate's turbulent schooldays. (EG: why did Kate never fight back when girls pulled her hair?)

But among a younger generation, the school of thought seems to be that liking Kate Bush is about as hip as owning a set of Melanie albums or else that she is… wonderful.

Someone at EMI said:" I 've yet to see anyone sum Kate Bush up."

Kate Bush said: "The thing I don't like about NME is it seems so cynical…"

Those are the two main problems.

^^^^^^^

It would be so easy to be horrible about Kate Bush. A hundred, even affectionate, jokes immediately come to mind.

The press tend to think Ms Bush is immune to satire, innuendo and downright rudeness. Somehow it's alright for Simon Bates to phone her up live on Radio 1 and bellow down the receiver about Kate's bank balance and sex life. The press can always say, "fuck you, you turgid cretin", but a household name is trained to be polite. It's a shame.

But on the other hand, Kate Bush is enigmatic, and what do you do when you don't understand someone? Either attack them ("Kate Bush is a spaced-out druid with lush tits…" is a familiar cry), or build fantasies around them a la Fred Vermorel.

I fell foul of the latter approach. I had so many preconceptions about the woman it was becoming painful. I expected her to be into horror movies, astrology, mysticism and sex, and based my questions around those subjects. I also expected her to have a sense of humour that would have me rolling in the aisles. I asked about the Kate Bush sense of humour at EMI and was told, yes, it existed but it was "off the wall". Unfortunately, it seemed to be out of the room when I was present, but then I shouldn't have expected a side-show.

I don't think the press would get Kate Bush so wrong, if she did not marry her music, which is strong enough already, to a controversial visual presentation. We've all got an instant picture of Kate Bush to draw on: "Oh yeah, she dances, don't she?" being another familiar cry. But think about it, how many dancing songwriters can you count on one hand?

Kate Bush has been somewhat dogged by her past, particularly in the light of the fact that she has been out of the public eye for over a year and her last major tour was as long ago as 1979. Hence impressions of Kate tend to be hopelessly outdated.

I never saw Kate Bush live, and had no interest in her work until the release of the 'Sat In Your Lap' single, so I asked EMI to show me some videos. I watched the Hammersmith gig from '79 and got a total shock: all Kate's songs which were finely imprinted on my brain were transformed into something straight out of Salem's Lot.

I got the impression that the 21-year-old Kate Bush was trying to be Peter Pan, but to me she came across as Varoomshka crossed with a vampire. It was genuinely frightening watching Kate stalking around the stage in various strange garb being man handled by two male/slave dancers, and pulling pained expressions with that extraordinary face of hers. Subtle it wasn't.

Four years on, Kate has calmed down a bit. I watched a preview of her Single File video; as might have been predicted, she is in her element on video. There's still quite a lot of frantic arm waving (and jeezus has she got a pair of arms!), but when she interprets her later material, she's easily one of the most entertaining musicians on film. The one's to look out for are: 'Army Dreamers' (see Kate get blown up), 'There Goes A Tenner' (see Kate blow a safe), 'Sat In Your Lap' (see men wearing goats' legs) and 'The Dreaming' (see God?).

Kate Bush hit her artistic peak on The Dreaming album. Yet sadly it wasn't recognised as an important or courageous album, and caused more confusion than fuss. The three singles taken from it, 'Sat In Your Lap', 'The Dreaming' and 'There Goes A Tenner', were her finest ever and sounded to me like sure-fire radio hits. But the Radio 1 DJs (except David Jensen) tittered nervously, and 'The Dreaming' just about did the whole station in.

She blew away that MOR' Wuthering Heights' image by changing her voice (lowering it) and injecting aggression into the music. There's a note on the bottom of The Dreaming album instructing you to play the record LOUD! Before, Kate Bush as a flaming great noise would never have occurred to anyone.

Kate Bush has always been a unique talent on the music scene. Her individuality and imagination are unusual in an industry which constantly makes do without either. As a songwriter she has the ability to take intriguing subject matter — yes, Wuthering Heights, Houdini, Henry James' The Turn Of The Screw, aspects of war, anything from aborigines getting mowed down by trucks to soft porn — and condensing it into song.

She wrote one of the best anti-army songs ever ('Army Dreamers'); and, of course, she has that voice, distinctive and constantly changing.

Her attitude to work is interesting. It's well known that the EMI machine has been good to her, allowing an extraordinary freedom in the running of her career. But there is still the pressure to promote herself and she has wilfully taken a back-seat. She spent so much time working on The Dreaming, she knackered herself and scrapped plans to tour. She is currently working on new material, but this is still only at the demo stage, and how long she will spend in the studio throwing her voice of walls is anyone's guess.

She is reluctant to do press because of bad experiences. She seems obsessed with doing things right, be it a performance or a photograph, and she does not seem afraid to wait. I find that a rare quality.

^^^^^^^^^^^

The interview I did with Kate Bush for two hours in a dance studio in South London was marred by the preconceptions I mentioned earlier.

I've got only one clear impression of Kate Bush's personality: she's sweet. She wouldn't stomp on a spider if it was three inches wide and crawling through her hair; she wouldn't shout at anyone no matter how obnoxious they were being. I got the feeling that all the energy other 25 year olds might expend on being sassy, sexy and a minor hell-raiser in order to impress their personality on the world, for her is contained and released in her work.

This is not to say Kate Bush outside of a studio or off a stage is vacuous or innocent, but she is unusually quiet. I saw no trace of the extrovert that comes across in her music: I don't think I gave her enough scope to talk about the things, chiefly her songwriting and her dancing, that she would have liked to.

A lot of the time was spent patiently explaining no, she wasn't into this or that, or no, that was an interesting way of looking at it, but not her way. As a "fan", I was probably cute. As an interviewer, a load of crap.

For example, I liked the way she handled this question:

Fred Vermorel wrote a curious thing about your lacking aggressive emotions. Yet The Dreaming seemed to work because it sounded so aggressive. Can you comment on that?

"I think the last album is about trying to cope… to get through all the shit. I think it was positive, showing how certain people approach all these negative things (war, crime etc). I don't think I'm actually an aggressive person. I think I can be… but I release that energy in work. I think it's wrong to get angry. If people get angry, it kind of freaks everybody out and they can't concentrate on what they're doing."

I thought that was an admirable piece of logic. I wasn't so keen on Kate's surprised dismissal of my question on her sexual identity as a female performer:

I once saw a photograph of you taken from your live tour and you were covered in sweat and licking the barrel of a gun. I found it erotic but frightening, because it was so blatant. (I also accused her, after watching the video of the Hammersmith gig of oozing sex all over the stage.) What, as a performer, are your feelings with regard to an audience's erotic reaction to you?

"I suppose it's something I don't really know about. Your energy on stage dictates the character you are (then). I'm too subjective. I just see me… either I get embarrassed or it's working."

It seemed to be news to Kate that her visual presence might have a dramatic sexual effect on people. I closed that part of the conversation with a muttered, "Well, it must be my filthy mind (chortle)". But later I remembered all the comments I'd heard when I'd told people I was going to meet Kate Bush: "tits" and "naked photographs" being uppermost.

Also, in a later question about her initial press identity, Kate remarked, "When I first appeared the press couldn't handle me in any normal way. I was the girl who sang in a funny voice with — 'The Body'…"

There is a video on the Video File that shows "The Body" to wonderful effect. As you can imagine, I buried the next question, Do you think women get off on you?, in fine flippant style. But I liked her candidness in other areas.

Do you like books?

"Yes. But I'm a really slow reader. Every time I read a good book it's in my head for weeks… like The Shining (Stephen King), that went straight into a song."

We had already established that Kate was a keen film fan when I asked this one:

Do you like gory things or taboo subjects?

"Some taboo subjects definitely attract me… I don't think I do like particularly gory things. Like, Don't Look Now, Psycho (films Kate likes), its not the gore so much as the emotional effect — the distortion. I don't think I'd ever go and see Texas Chainsaw Massacre and Friday The 13th, things like that. It think it's sick. You KNOW everybody is going to die disgustingly. I prefer films that work around the subject, build you up…"

Did you ever go through the hippie stage?

"No. I was just a few years too young. In some ways my attitudes could be associated with the time. I mean, I was growing up in the '60s…" (EG: Kate is well gone on The Beatles).

Were you ever into teenage (fashion) cults. Like a skinhead (titter) or something?

"No. I don't think I ever felt I could be convincing enough in any of the roles."

Do you ever get drunk?

"I don't really like alcohol. It doesn't get on with my body… (But) I've got a strong stomach. I can eat a lot… a great combination of things."

Well, I think it's far more interesting to know that Kate Bush is a gut than that Lena Zavaroni is a Freudian anorexic.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You wouldn't believe how physically small Kate Bush is. After the interview, I looked down at her and, for a split second, I wondered how she'd ever make it across the street, let alone be someone people would like to touch, annoy, know. She lacks the cynicism and mistrust of the '80s, yet she's got a single-mindedness that transgresses all the pitfalls of fashion and falling sales. We should stop bugging her.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

And here is Solanas reviewing a book by her erstwhile hero / ally / role model (?) Julie Burchill



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

More Jane Suck through the auspices of Sounds Clips