I've posted here before about Mick Farren's famous "The Titanic Sails At Dawn" polemic. Appearing in the NME's June 19 1976 issue, the piece is legendarily claimed to have played a precipitative role in the punk uprising. It identified a malaise in rock: the loss of its connection to "the streets" and "the kids" that traverse them; the recline and fall of a rebel sound into mere showbiz. And in the process it birthed a mini-genre of explicitly or implicitly Titanic-themed jeremiads, which cropped up in the pages of the NME over the next decade (as well as the pages of zines populated by NME-wannabes).
I've also noted here that six months earlier Mick Farren had written a very similar - and to my mind, sharper - argument in the first NME issue of 1976. A piece that no one seems to remember, and for whatever reason, it didn't seem to have any precipitative effect. Timing is everything.
Talking about timing... Well, here's a funny thing: turns out Mick Farren wrote yet another similar piece almost a year before the first of those 1976 pieces. The complaint is the same: the Seventies so far is a wash-out and rock's new superstar aristocracy - aka the Uncle Toms of Teendom - have "taken Rock off the streets and into the penthouse".
And here's another funny thing - four years after "The Titanic Sails At Dawn", Farren rocks up yet again in the page of NME with a polemic about the music's aesthetic bankruptcy and directionlessness.
I suppose four handwringing thinkpieces across five or six years isn't that excessive.
At Monitor, I must have written two or three with that vibe in just two years / six issues.
David Stubbs wrote a piece on that theme in virtually every issue of Monitor - hilariously vivid evocations of impending entropy.
And then at the end of '86 we co-wrote a rather gloomy overview for Melody Maker (the editor complained it was a bummer way to wrap up the year). Not one of our most coherent efforts, but maybe I should dredge it up as a period curio.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Not forgetting Mick Farren's entire book on this approximate subject.... from a few years prior to the 1975 piece "The Kids Are Not Necessarily Alright". With the word "Kids" in the title.
At that point - most likely writing the book in 1971 - Farren still retained some optimism about the radical potential of rock and youth culture. The tone of Watch Out Kids is defiant - the gathering decadence can be turned around.
The story of "how Elvis gave birth to the Angry Brigade" promises the jacket copy.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is a genre of rock essay - the dispirited measuring of Rock's vital signs.
A classic example is this piece by Greil Marcus.
Some of Lester Bangs's most famous pieces are in that mode, albeit always pointing to green shoots of vitalizing vulgarity that defy the overall atrophy.
No surprises here, but I personally love the "The Death of ________" essay.
Every art form has its examples. E.g. "The Literature of Exhaustion".




